Jump Start # 4054
Proverbs 18:17 The first to plead his case seems right, until another comes and examines him.
One has to love how plain, practical and timeless the Proverbs are. Although very ancient when written, they come to us as if the ink is still fresh upon the page. And, once again, as in so many of the powerful Proverbs we find a contrast. Two people, “the first,” and then “another,” as well as two stories, the first story and then the different story after an examination.
Most of the modern English translations place the word “until” between the contrasting stories. At first, based on what the first person said, it seemed right. UNTIL, another comes. The story then changed. It changed based upon examination. The KJV states it this way: “…but his neighbor cometh and searcheth him.” Things changed with the “UNTIL.” The facts showed that what seemed right wasn’t. The examination made all the difference.
Immediately, we see this verse in so many settings. A person is pulled over by the police. He pleads his case and concocts a story that is going to remove any guilt. It seems right, just like our verse says, until the police do a little digging around and investigating, and the story doesn’t hold up. The person is given a ticket or worse, he is taken away in handcuffs. He is not innocent, even though he said he was.
Mom and dad are downstairs watching a movie. The kids are upstairs. A loud crash is heard. The parents rush upstairs, open the bedroom door, and a lamp lies smashed on the floor. “What happened,” the parents declare. The eyes of the kids shift back and forth until one points to the little brother. Somehow the little brother is always the first blamed. Before the parents lower the boom on the little guy, they ask more questions. They examine the situation and find out “the first to plead his case seems right, “ but he isn’t. Not only did the big kids break the lamp, but they put the blame on the little brother who was innocent.
A couple sits down with the shepherds in the church. Their marriage has been ugly for a long time. It’s headed for a divorce. When the shepherds ask what’s going on, “the first to plead his case seems right.” Doing a little examining, the elders find out that the first to plead his case wasn’t right.
What are some things we need to remember about this passage?
First, just because someone paints a great picture of how wrong everyone else is, and how they have been mistreated, doesn’t mean that is what really happened. The saying, “there are two sides to every story,” seems to be a good understanding of this passage.
Why would the first present an image that seems right? Especially, when upon examination, he wasn’t right. A person does that to make themselves look good. A person does that hoping that no one will examine the story. One does that because they are looking for support, sympathy and people that will defend him, even though his story is not true.
I’ve known a preacher who told me that he was fired because of something his daughter did. That really seemed odd to me. I knew the church he was talking about. When I ask a few, I found out he was never fired. He left on his own. We can carry the badge of a victim and present ourselves as martyrs to make ourselves look good. That sure seems to be a problem of self image and hiding behind what really happened. It’s best to be open and honest, even if it means admitting that we made some dumb choices.
Second, your story better be right when you tell it because there is always someone who will examine what was said. Fact-checking is what we call it these days. The first person in our verse now looks like a dishonest person. He made himself look right, but he wasn’t. He said things that weren’t true. He must have hoped that people would believe him just because he said it. When a person loses his job, oh the things he will say to make it look like it was the company’s fault.
Rather than pleading your case to look right, just be right. Be honest in your words. Everyone feels sorry for the victim. Taken advantage of. No one to plead his case to. No one who seems to care. The tears roll. But in our passage, there was no victim. The first person didn’t get the facts right. He twisted the story to his advantage. He made himself look good, when he wasn’t good.
I wonder how few preachers really know this passage. I’ve heard of so many being let go because they were lazy, dishonest or immoral. Instead of repenting, they find another congregation that takes them in without checking the details. He comes in with a sad story of how unfair and wrong the last church was. Yet, within a few months, the new place learns that it was not the church that was a mess, but the preacher. He had told them a good story about how right he was.
Third, much too often, the person who did the examining is made out to be the bad guy. The facts were revealed. The truth was made known. What the first person was saying, wasn’t true. Yet, he has a following, and they turn on the one who simply examined and checked the details. What was being said didn’t add up. Things were missing. Things were inconsistent. Parts of the story were left out. Only one side of the story was revealed.
Immediately, the one who brought the facts to the surface, is branded as a trouble-maker and emotional and verbal attacks are made upon him. All he did was check the story out. And, in doing this, what was being said wasn’t true. But, the first person who had pleaded that he was right is carried through the air as the victim and honored for all the hardship he had endured. There just wasn’t any hardship. It was all made up. And, in time, when the truth is realized, the first person is cast aside as being dishonest and untrustworthy.
So, what should we take away from this passage?
- Don’t be so quick to plead your innocence. Let the facts come forth.
- Don’t be so arrogant that you cannot admit and confess that you were wrong.
- Don’t attack the person who just wants to get to the bottom of the story. That person is seeking the truth. He is not trying to disprove the first person. He is willing to let the evidence speak for itself.
These are lessons needed in the home. These are lessons needed among brethren. Just because you say something doesn’t mean it’s right. And, let us never forget, the Lord knows. The Lord knows hearts. The Lord knows motives. The Lord knows things that we many never see.
The first man was right UNTIL another came along.
Roger
